USPTO serial 97920276
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Troup, TX, US
Troup, TX, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Taylor M. Norton, Reg. No. 65050
Taylor M. Norton, Reg. No. 65050 NORTON IP LAW FIRM LLC345 METAIRIE ROADMETAIRIE, LA 70005United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags; Radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags for attachable and removable connection to aircraft passenger luggage; Electronic barcode label with integrated radio frequency identification (RFID) chips; quick response code readers; Radio-frequency identification (RFID) readers; Near field communication (NFC) technology-enabled readers; Radio frequency identification (RFID) credentials, namely, RFID cards and RFID tags and RFID readers for radio frequency identification credentials; Radio-frequency identification (RFID) cards and readers and wireless transmitters and wireless receivers for use with vehicles and powered and non-powered assets, namely, luggage, luggage scales, conveyor belts, aircraft ground support equipment, luggage trucks, cranes, packages, pallets, and containers; Radio-frequency identification (RFID) luggage tags; Sensors for radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags for detection and tracking of aircraft passenger lugger relative to aircraft doors; Computer hardware and downloadable computer software for wirelessly tracking, securing, controlling, managing, and analyzing luggage and powered and non-powered assets, namely, conveyor belts, cranes, aircraft ground support equipment, luggage, luggage scales, luggage trucks, packages, pallets, and containers; Radio-frequency identification (RFID) systems for the tracking and detecting an anomaly of aircraft passenger luggage, said systems being comprised primarily of attachable and removable RFID tags and RFID readers; Anti-theft locks specially adapted to personal electronic devices, namely, laptops, PC tablets; Batteries, electric; Electronic locks incorporating biometric iris, fingerprint, voice scanners; Electronic access control systems for luggage locks; Padlocks, electronic; Rechargeable batteries | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2026 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2025 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2025 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2023 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |