USPTO serial 97933937
PICARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PICARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fontainebleau, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cathleen E. Stadecker
Cathleen E. Stadecker DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STREET, PO BOX 190BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0190United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game, not live; Meat extracts; Ready-made frozen meals made with vegetables, meat, vegetable, fish, poultry or game; Pressed, preserved, dried and cooked or deep-frozen fruits and vegetables; fruit and vegetable salads; Eggs; Milk; Butter; Yogurts; Cream; Cheese; Milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Soups; Bouillon; Edible oils and fats; Crustaceans, not live; Seafood, not live; Molluscs, not live; Shellfish, not live; Escargots, not live; Appetizers consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, shellfish, snails, fruit and vegetables, eggs and milk; All the aforementioned goods being frozen or deep-frozen | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Edible ices; Ice for refreshment; Ice cream; Sherbets; Iced desserts, namely, iced cakes; Frozen entremets, namely, frozen desserts consisting of flavored ice blocks with toppings; Ready-made frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta, rice, quinoa, semolina, cereals, tapioca; Frozen oilseeds; Appetizers made from bread and alimentary paste; Plum-cakes; Pizzas; Quiches; Crepes; Processed cereals; Farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; Preparations made from cereal, namely, breakfast cereals and cereal bars; Tabbouleh; Couscous; Processed semolina; Rice; Pasta; Pasta containing meat stuffing; Pasta containing stuffings; Sandwiches; Bread; Pastries; Viennoiserie; Fruit coulis; Pastry cream; Chocolates; all the aforementioned goods being frozen or deep-frozen | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 7, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |