USPTO serial 98035491
DATABREEZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PORTARO, ALEXANDRA J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DATABREEZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Saul
James J. Saul Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP320 South Canal Street, Suite 3300Chicago, IL 60606United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of virtual reality software; development of computer programs for combustion process analysis inside an engine; development of augmented reality software; design of augmented reality software; computer systems monitoring services by remote access to ensure proper functioning; Architectural designing of automobile plant; Engineering design services of automobile plant; Designing plant components and equipment for automobile plants; electronic storage of digital video files; development of computer hardware for multimedia data storing and recalling; design of computer hardware for processing and distribution of multimedia contents; providing technical advice relating to computer hardware and software; design of computer hardware for the manufacturing industries; engineering surveying; Quality management services, namely, quality assurance in the field of automobiles and computer hardware and software; Scientific research relating to the computerized automation of industrial processes; Scientific research relating to the computerized automation of technical processes; industrial process research in the field of automobiles; consulting services in the field of artificial intelligence technology for office and workplace automation; technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 30, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Mar 13, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |