Drawing for DUSTSCREEN

USPTO serial 98035500

DUSTSCREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JOHNSON, JAYLEN SYLVIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUSTSCREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew D. Price

Andrew D. Price VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Biopolymer in the nature of chemical preparation used as a sand and soil stabilizer, dust palliative, dewatering agent for sand and soil erosion control, and for protecting sand and soil from water and wind erosion; chemical composition for dust control and dust stabilization for use in connection with mining roads, quarries, unpaved municipal roads, airfields, industrial sites, construction sites; chemical additives for use in dust control; chemical preparations for soil stabilization, erosion control, dust suppression and dust controlACTIVE
019Polymeric bitumen emulsion for road surfaces, walls and roofs, namely, a water-based organic emulsion used for surface and deep based stabilization and dust control of clay, sand, mixed earth, stone, rock, mixed gravel, and a combination crushed stone and stone dustACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 26, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 15, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Sep 11, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 6, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 5, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 5, 2024ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jul 3, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 3, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 22, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 22, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 29, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 13, 2023NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 13, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance