USPTO serial 98230628
WINCLOSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GORAN, BRADLEY TAYLOR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WINCLOSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GABRIELLE S. ROTH
GABRIELLE S. ROTH SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW, SUITE 9000WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES OF AMERICAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Flexible packaging materials made from synthetic plastic films used to package pharmaceuticals and healthcare related products in the nature of plastic medication containers for personal and commercial use | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed and non-printed lidding films of plastic used to package food, liquids, pet food, beverages, pharmaceuticals, and health care related products; flexible packaging materials made from synthetic plastic films for food, liquids, pet food, beverages; semi-rigid plastic film for packaging for food, pharmaceuticals, and liquids | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Flexible lidding materials, namely, closures, not of metal, for containers; plastic trays made from rigid plastic for foodstuffs packaging; containers made from rigid plastic for industrial packaging of food, liquids, pet food, beverages, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare related products | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cups made from rigid plastic for food, liquids, pet food, beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom fabrication for others of printed and non-printed lidding films of plastic, of rigid plastic sheets for packaging, of flexible lidding materials, of rigid plastic packaging, cups, trays and containers for food, liquids, pet food, beverages, pharmaceuticals, healthcare related products, and industrial applications, of flexible packaging materials made from synthetic films, of flexible packaging materials made from foil, of semi-rigid plastic film for packaging and of semi-rigid plastic packaging | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Winpak Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named WINCLOSE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |