Drawing for XLM

USPTO serial 98330484

XLM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XLM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary Gillen

Gary Gillen Klintworth & Rozenblat IP LLP2045 W. Grand Ave.Ste. B, PMB 84396Chicago, IL 60612

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a Service (SaaS) services, namely providing access to nondownloadable software providing chat and communication assistance via natural language understanding, natural language generation, machine learning, and artificial intelligence; Design and development of computer software in the field of consumer and business communication and productivity; Design and development of computer software in the field of artificial intelligence; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely artificial intelligence software for analyzing, monitoring, and augmenting communications; Non-downloadable, cloud-based artificial intelligence software for augmenting communications by online chat, phone, email, and online applications; Non-downloadable, cloud-based software for data analysis, pattern discovery, process automation, contextual prediction, predictive analytics, predictive modeling, natural language recognition and generation, classification, segmentation, regression, decision support and visualization utilizing natural language understanding, machine learning, and artificial intelligenceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 7, 2025EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 7, 2025EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 7, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 3, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 3, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 8, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 5, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 5, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 5, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED
Oct 21, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 8, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 26, 2023NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance