Drawing for HIGHLIGHT SEARCH

USPTO serial 98471398

HIGHLIGHT SEARCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DINALLO, KEVIN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGHLIGHT SEARCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy Bechen

Timothy Bechen Woods Rogers901 East Byrd Street, Suite 1600Richmond, VA 23219United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for generating computer software prompts by tracking computer interactions and generating the prompts based on computer analysis of the computer interactions; Downloadable computer software for generating artificial intelligence engine prompts by tracking computer interactions and generating the prompts based on computer analysis of the computer interactionsACTIVE
042Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for generating computer software prompts by tracking computer interactions and generating the prompts based on computer analysis of the computer interactions; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software for generating artificial intelligence engine prompts by tracking computer interactions and generating the prompts based on computer analysis of the computer interactions; Application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, analyzing, and maintaining applications and software in the fields of computer generated software prompting software; Application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, analyzing, and maintaining applications and software in the fields of artificial intelligence prompting softwareACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2026EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 20, 2026EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 17, 2026AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 6, 2026TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Jan 6, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jan 6, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 6, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 10, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2025EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 8, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 11, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 16, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 16, 2025XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 16, 2025GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 16, 2025GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jan 16, 2025CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 6, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 6, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 6, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 8, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 2, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 27, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance