USPTO serial 98586702
SMARTNG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 660Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWAY, TATIANA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with SMARTNG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN A. YIRGA
JOHN A. YIRGA Watts Law LLC2337 W. 11th StreetSuite 2Cleveland, OH 44113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | TRANSCRIPTION OF TEXT AND AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS RENDERED USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI), NAMELY, TRANSCRIBING EMERGENCY 9-1-1 AND NON-EMERGENCY CALLS FOR REGIONAL, STATE, AND LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES TO IMPROVE 9-1-1 CALL DELIVERY, ANSWER, AND RESPONSE TIMES | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2023 |
| 038 | CALL RECORDING SERVICES RENDERED USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI), NAMELY, RECORDING EMERGENCY 9-1-1 AND NON-EMERGENCY CALLS FOR REGIONAL, STATE, AND LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES TO IMPROVE 9-1-1 CALL DELIVERY, ANSWER, AND RESPONSE TIMES | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2023 |
| 042 | DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE SYSTEMS USED TO ENHANCE CALL PROCESSING, NAMELY, SOFTWARE SYSTEMS USING MACHINE LEARNING (ML) AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) TO RECORD, TRANSCRIBE, TRANSLATE, AND ANALYZE EMERGENCY 9-1-1 AND NON-EMERGENCY CALLS AND CALL DATA FOR USE BY REGIONAL, STATE, AND LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES TO IMPROVE 9-1-1 CALL DELIVERY, ANSWER, AND RESPONSE TIMES; SOFTWARE SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ONLINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE USING MACHINE LEARNING (ML) AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) TO RECORD, TRANSCRIBE, TRANSLATE, AND ANALYZE EMERGENCY 9-1-1 AND NON-EMERGENCY CALLS AND CALL DATA FOR USE BY REGIONAL, STATE, AND LOCAL PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES TO IMPROVE 9-1-1 CALL DELIVERY, ANSWER, AND RESPONSE TIMES | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2026 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |