USPTO serial 98596172
KAIYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 748
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, HANNAH B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAIYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Herndon, VA, US
Herndon, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gavin J. O'Keefe
Gavin J. O'Keefe McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP300 S Wacker DriveSuite 3100Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring analytics software using artificial intelligence for data analysis, trend identification, insight generation, and workflow automation, all in industries other than the agricultural cultivation industry, and excluding use in connection with change management | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 20, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |