Drawing for MILQ

USPTO serial 98599124

MILQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 794
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POMEROY-MURPHY, KAITLIN I
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ELIZABETH BAIO

ELIZABETH BAIO NIXON PEABODY LLP70 WEST MADISON STREET SUITE 5200CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed surveys and reports in the field of lactationACTIVEMay 19, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2026IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Jun 1, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 29, 2026AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
May 29, 2026IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
May 29, 2026EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 30, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 26, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED
Nov 26, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 29, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 7, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 7, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED
Apr 6, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 2, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 13, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance