USPTO serial 98700235
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. Monitor the opposition window. After it closes, watch for Notice of Allowance (intent-to-use) or registration (use-based).
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAFFI ZEROUNIAN
RAFFI ZEROUNIAN HANSON BRIDGETT LLP425 MARKET STREET26TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the use of security assurance best practices of others in the fields of business computing and data governance; computer file management; updating and maintenance of data in computer databases; business assistance services, namely, assisting businesses with assessing, guarding against and addressing cybersecurity threats to business systems; data collection service for business purposes using proprietary software to collect, control, evaluate, manage, monitor, report on, classify, manage permissions for, audit and analyze data | ACTIVE | Oct 21, 2013 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) service featuring software for discovering, collecting, classifying, controlling access, and evaluation of data, removing exposures, automating processes, and monitoring, detecting and reporting on cyberattacks and similar security risks and threats, in the fields of cybersecurity and data governance; software as a services (SaaS) featuring data automation software to collect, control, evaluate, manage, monitor, report on, classify, manage permissions for, audit and analyze data; technology consultation in the field of cybersecurity and data governance; cybersecurity and data governance services in the nature of restricting unauthorized access to computer systems; computer security consultancy; data security consultancy; design and development of electronic data security systems; computer security threat analysis for protecting data; computer services, namely, data recovery services; design, development, installation, maintenance and updating of computer software in the fields of cybersecurity and data governance; development of customized software for others for use in risk assessment, data governance, information security, business analysis, audit and audit planning; computer security services, namely restricting unauthorized access to computer networks; data automation and collection service using proprietary software to collect, control, evaluate, manage, monitor, report on, classify, manage permissions for, audit and analyze data; providing online, non-downloadable software for data collection processing using proprietary software to collect, control, evaluate, manage, monitor, report on, classify, manage permissions for, audit and analyze data; artificial intelligence as a service (AIaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for identifying data security vulnerabilities and breaches and providing alerts; providing an interactive web site featuring technology that enables users to enter, access, track, manage, monitor and generate information and reports regarding their in-house cybersecurity and data governance; providing an interactive web site featuring technology that enables users in controlling, managing, monitoring, reporting on, classifying, managing permissions for, auditing and analyzing data access and usage; software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for developing custom security threat detection, investigation, and response tools; software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer security software for computer, software applications, cloud, and computer network security, automated domain threat protection and prevention, analysis and management of computer threat data, security information and event management, detection, and elimination of computer threats, cyberattacks and data breaches, exploit protection and prevention, and automated remediation and restoration of compromised computer software and hardware; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software and computer security problems | ACTIVE | Oct 21, 2013 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 5, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 6, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |