USPTO serial 98792187
SAUCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 643
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAUCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus Risso
Marcus Risso Mitchell Law Firm4413 Coldwater Canyon Ave.Studio City, CA 91604United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food products, namely, fruit snacks, all of the aforementioned containing hemp with less than 0.3 percent Delta 9 THC | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Popcorn, caramels, food products, namely, candy, gummy candies, bakery goods, cookies, brownies, taffy, flavored ice, all of the aforementioned containing hemp with less than 0.3 percent Delta 9 THC | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail outlet and retail store services in the field of consumable hemp products containing less than 0.3 percent Delta 9 THC | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |