USPTO serial 98802137
CAPIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LARKEY, MICHAEL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAPIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kitchener, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew D. Kendall
Matthew D. Kendall Gardner, Linn, Burkhart & Ondersma LLP2900 Charlevoix Drive, S.E., Suite 300Grand Rapids, MI 49546United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Artificial intelligence machine learning powered computer software, namely, downloadable software for educational institutions, governments and student users for planning, monitoring and executing their student enrollment strategy. | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Recruitment solutions, namely, providing student recruitment leads, management of recruiting agents, and enrollment services for the education industry. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Recruitment solutions, namely, management of recruiting agents, providing recruitment partners for international student consulting, virtual training services in the field of college admissions, and student-peer educational counseling services to assist students in planning and preparing for further education; Admissions management and support being admission consulting services, namely, consulting in the field of college admissions, specifically, college selection, completing admissions applications, and preparation for college admission interviews. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Artificial intelligence machine learning powered cloud computing, namely cloud computing featuring software for educational institutions for planning, monitoring and executing their student enrollment strategy with access to research and marketing insights and reports; Artificial intelligence co-pilot support, namely, artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for educational institutions for planning, monitoring and executing their student enrollment strategy with access to research and marketing insights and reports. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |