USPTO serial 98823409
EARTHKIDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUTHWICK, TYLER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 136
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EARTHKIDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme
Dyan Finguerra-DuCharme Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Video game system comprised of hand held units for playing video games and associated game cartridges sold as a unit; Hand held unit for playing electronic games; Coin-operated video games; Stand alone video game machines; Stand alone video output game machines; Electronic educational game machines for children; Action skill games; Action target games; Party games; Promotional game cards; Ring games; Role playing games; Target games; Arcade games; Arcade-type electronic education video games; Board games; Cube type puzzles; Jigsaw puzzles; Manipulative puzzles; Card games; Playing cards; Playing card cases; Equipment sold as a unit for playing board games, card games and memory games, namely, dice, dice cups, board games, card games, and memory games; Equipment sold as a unit for playing action type target games; LCD game machines; Toys and playthings, namely, play figures, toy figures, positionable toy figures, plastic character toys, action figures and accessories therefore, toy action figures, toy action figures and accessories therefore, modeled plastic toy figurines, rubber character toys, cases for action figures, electric and mechanical action toys, mechanical toys, battery operated action toys, wind-up walking toys, bendable toys, collectable toy figures, electric action toys, fantasy character toys, construction toys, electronically operated toy motor vehicles, inflatable toys, squeezable squeaking toys, squeeze toys, pop up toys, musical toys, music box toys, printing toys, pull toys, push toys, punching toys, ride-on toys, sand toys, sandbox toys, sketching toys, party favors in the nature of small toys, cases for toy structures, cases for toy vehicles, toy banks, toy nesting, stacking and sorting boxes for children, puppets, balloons; sporting goods, namely, beach balls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 16, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |