USPTO serial 98844023
PROMARKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with PROMARKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ontario, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allan Howard Grant
Allan Howard Grant Grant's Law Firm17351 Greentree DriveRiverside, CA 92503United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric food blenders; Electric food choppers; Electric food grinders; Electric food grinders for commercial use namely, graters, blenders, mixers, choppers, and mincers; Electric food mixers; Electric food preparation apparatus, namely, tumblers for marinating food; Electric food processors; Electrically-powered kitchen appliance for dicing, mincing, slicing and chopping food; Food chopping machines for commercial use; Food cutting machines for commercial use; Food extruding machines; Food extrusion machines; Food peeling machines for commercial use; Food processors, electric; Food slicing machines for commercial use; Packaging machines; Packaging machines and parts thereof; Packaging machines for food; Packaging machines, namely, liquid container fillers; Vacuum packaging machines; Vacuum packing machines; Vacuum pads for vacuum pump machines; Vacuum pumps; Automatic packing machines for food; Blades for electric food processors; Components for machines and machine tools, grinding machines, material handling machines, food processing machines, chemistry processing machines and textile industry machines, namely, sand, chemical and reverse osmosis filters; Drives for vacuum pumps; Electric bag sealers; Hydraulic pumps and motors for hydrostatic systems, comprised of pumps, motors, valves, switches, sensors and electronic controls, for hydraulic drives and force transmission in machines, machine tools, grinding and food processing machines and in off-road-vehicles; Industrial surface treatment equipment, namely, vacuum plasma treatment systems comprised of a high frequency, high voltage generator, controls, and treatment chamber and structural parts therefor; Machine parts in the nature of mechanical seals; Mechanical seals being parts of machines; Packing machines under vacuum | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 14, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |