Drawing for QUIKBEAM

USPTO serial 98867734

QUIKBEAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 794
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KOLODNER, LOUIS FRANCIS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUIKBEAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SAM YIP

SAM YIP IDEA INTELLECTUAL LIMITED199 DES VOEUX ROAD CENTRAL SHEUNG WANLEVEL 29 INFINITUS PLAZAHONG KONG, 103622

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Light bulbs; electric light bulbs; lamps; smart light bulbs; lanterns for lighting; lamp shades; electric discharge tubes for lighting; light diffusers; lamp chimneys; lighting apparatus, namely, lighting installations; luminous tubes for lighting; lamp holders, namely, cases specifically adapted for holding lamps; street lamps; light-emitting diodes (LED) lighting apparatus; projection lamps; Chemiluminescent light sticks; Fluorescent Lamps; Stage lighting apparatus; Spot lamps; Film stage lighting apparatus; fluorescent lamp tubes; Filters for lighting apparatus; Light fittings for ceiling lights and discharge lamps; Strobe lights being lighting apparatus for creating light effects; SpotlightsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 26, 2026GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Mar 26, 2026GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Mar 26, 2026CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Mar 10, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 10, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 10, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 4, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Mar 4, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 4, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Mar 3, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 3, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 20, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 20, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED
Aug 20, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED
May 20, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 26, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 22, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance