Drawing for RB-Y1

USPTO serial 98884794

RB-Y1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 651
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, BRITTANY S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RB-Y1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sang Ho Lee

Sang Ho Lee Bridgeway IP Law Group, PLLC11350 Random Hills RdSuite 800Fairfax, VA 22030

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Humanoid robots with artificial intelligence for use in scientific research; humanoid robots having communication and learning functions for assisting and entertaining people; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence for preparing beverages; security surveillance robots; teaching robots; downloadable computer application software for robots, namely, software for controlling robots; recorded computer application software for robots, namely, software for controlling robots; downloadable operating system software for robots; recorded operating system software for robots; downloadable application software for smart devices for controlling robots; downloadable computer software for robot programming; recorded computer software for robot programming; electronic controllers for robotACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2026GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 15, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance