Drawing for HELIUS

USPTO serial 98896226

HELIUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STRASSLE, MARIANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 136

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HELIUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Francesco Sardone

Francesco Sardone Carter, DeLuca & Farrell, LLP576 Broadhollow RoadMelville, NY 11747United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Manipulative logic puzzles; Manipulative puzzles; Educational toys for teaching math principles to children, namely, manipulative blocks for displaying patterns and groupings; Jigsaw and manipulative puzzles; Magnetic building blocks being toys; Toy building blocks capable of interconnection; Toy building structuresACTIVE
041Arranging and conducting academic enrichment programs in the science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) fieldsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jul 22, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 1, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 1, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 1, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 20, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 11, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance