USPTO serial 98949924
ORALUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Deadline: November 12, 2026
Need help with ORALUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Office Action issues
The USPTO examiner refused your trademark application due to a likelihood of confusion with an existing registered trademark.
Section 2(d): Likelihood of Confusion
Cited marks: 98760852
Owner
Diamond Bar, CA, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Teeth whitening kit; Teeth whitening preparations; Teeth whitening pens sold filled with teeth whitening preparations; Tooth whitening gels | ACTIVE | Nov 28, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |