USPTO serial 98959189
QNETIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOI, REBECCA EJ
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QNETIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NICOLASVILLE, KY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN G. ROONEY
KEVIN G. ROONEY ROONEY IP, LLC8044 MONTGOMERY ROAD, SUITE 410CINCINNATI, OH 45236UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for providing management tools that control access codes, route schedules, lock locations, code related information, permissions, and other information for wireless and network connected locks; Downloadable cloud-computing software providing interaction between a user and one or more access control systems for purposes of remote management, monitoring and use of an access control system, namely, automated teller machines, banks, retailer safes, jewelry safes, gun safes, consumer safes, general purpose safes, vaults and other physical security devices; Downloadable mobile applications for providing interaction between a user and one or more access control systems for purposes of remote management, monitoring and use of an access control systems, namely, electronic locks, keypads and access controls connected to an access control system, namely, automated teller machines, banks, retailer safes, jewelry safes, gun safes, consumer safes, general purpose safes, vaults and other physical security devices; locks and access control systems, namely, electronic locks, programmable locking systems consisting of electronic cylinder locksets and keypads, and access controls and alarm monitoring systems; all of the foregoing for use in commercial and industrial security applications, or for use in residential security applications featuring Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or network connectivity | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for providing management tools that control access codes, route schedules, lock locations, code related information, permissions, and other information for wireless and network connected locks; Cloud computing featuring software for providing interaction between a user and one or more access control systems for purposes of remote management, monitoring and use of an access control system, namely, automated teller machines, banks, retailer safes, jewelry safes, gun safes, consumer safes, general purpose safes, vaults and other physical security devices; all of the foregoing for use in commercial and industrial security applications, or for use in residential security applications featuring Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or network connectivity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 2, 2026 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |