USPTO serial 98976418
SINGULARITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOPENSKI, CLAUDIA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SINGULARITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Donostia, Gipuzkoa, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander JSW Johnson
Alexander JSW Johnson Fishman Stewart PLLC800 Tower Drive, Suite 610Troy, MI 48098United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and recorded software for development, maintenance, and operation of large language models | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Quantum computing services, namely, providing, designing, and developing technology for, data compression for, and modeling and solving optimization problems for artificial intelligence, large language models, deep neural networks, deep learning, machine learning, and quantum computing; Quantum computing services, namely, providing software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for designing, developing, editing, compressing data, and modeling and solving optimization problems for artificial intelligence, large language models, deep neural networks, deep learning, machine learning, and quantum computing; Development and testing of computational methods, algorithms, and software in the field of artificial intelligence, large language models, deep neural networks, deep learning, machine learning, and quantum computing, and for data compression and model optimization related to the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2025 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 3, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |