Drawing for VISIONMASTER

USPTO serial 98977766

VISIONMASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VISIONMASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dennis S. Prahl

Dennis S. Prahl Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer storage devices, namely, blank flash drives; interactive touch screen terminals; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence for scientific research; face recognition devices, namely, cameras, video cameras and computer hardware used for facial scanning and recognition; face recognition systems comprised of computer hardware and downloadable pattern recognition software for identifying human faces; radio equipment, namely, radio receivers and transmitters; video phones; security surveillance items, namely, surveillance cameras, security surveillance robots, microphones, recorders; remote controls for security surveillance robots; alarms, namely, fire alarms and burglar alarmsACTIVE
042Computer programming; computer software consulting; providing computer technology and programming information through websites; information technology project management consulting; development of computer platforms; cloud computing, namely, cloud hosting provider service; computer software updates; computer software maintenance and upgrades; computer software design for others; creation and maintenance of websites for others; computer software installation; mobile phone software design; mobile application design and developmentACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2026TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2026MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Mar 2, 2026DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Mar 2, 2026AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 6, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 6, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 6, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2025ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Oct 24, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED
Oct 24, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2025DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2025ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Aug 7, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Aug 7, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 7, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 14, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 14, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 14, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED
May 19, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 16, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 12, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance