Drawing for VISTAR

USPTO serial 99025779

VISTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 649Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HURTADO,DIANA V
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Need help with VISTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeremy D. Spier

Jeremy D. Spier Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP600 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 5200Atlanta, GA 30308United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Digital out-of-home advertising services; Marketing and advertising technology services, namely, providing access to demand-side platform (DSP), supply-side platform (SSP), an ad server, and an ad player for use in creating, delivering, tracking, and managing digital advertising campaigns on third party digital signage networks; Ad serving, namely, placing advertisements on digital out-of-home screens for others using specialized computer software, tracking interactions and performance metrics; Development, operation and administration of digital signage systems and digital advertising systems for others, namely, providing advertising space by electronic means and global computer information networksACTIVE—
042Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for programmatic advertising and digital out-of-home advertising services and digital signage solutions; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for content management, organization and distribution; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for ad serving, namely placing advertisements on digital out-of-home screens for others using specialized computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2026TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2026EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Oct 21, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2026CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2026COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2026RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Sep 8, 2026RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2026RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Sep 1, 2026ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 24, 2026ISMRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Aug 11, 2026NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2026PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 5, 2026NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2026EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 10, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 18, 2026EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 18, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 18, 2026EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 24, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 24, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 6, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Oct 6, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 31, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance