USPTO serial 99042038
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
VALLEY STREAM, NY, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erin C. Bray
Erin C. Bray Trademark Lawyer Law Firm, PLLCP.O. Box 512Ann Arbor, MI 48106-0512United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Sculptures of china, crystal, earthenware, terra cotta, glass, and porcelain; kitchen utensils, namely, hand-operated grinders for food, spices and herbs; kitchen containers, namely, spice jars; household food storage containers; baking tools, namely, baking dishes and baking mats; household containers for food and beverages; eco-friendly kitchenware, namely, biodegradable bowls, cups, and plates | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |