USPTO serial 99045084
HARP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, QC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Zalcman
Robert Zalcman Renno & Co LLP3 Place Ville-MarieSuite 400Montreal, H3B 2E3Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and downloadable and recorded computer software featuring haptics technology for use in human-computer interaction in medicine procedures, namely, to control computer interface devices in the simulation of training procedures, to create a visualization on a screen or display of the training procedures being simulated, to enable feel and force feedback sensation while performing procedures with a hardware device and to enable feel and force feedback sensation while performing a simulated training procedure; computer hardware and downloadable and recorded computer software featuring haptics technology for use in computer games and video games; console gaming products and gaming devices, namely, downloadable and recorded video and computer game programs; wearable peripherals for playing video games specially adapted for computers, video game consoles, handheld video game consoles, tablet computers, mobile devices, and mobile telephones, namely, headsets for virtual and augmented reality games; none of the foregoing for the protection of confidentiality of face-to-face conversations or in the field of speech privacy or protection | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | haptic suits for medical purposes; surgical robots featuring haptics technology with integrated recorded operating system software for drawing freehand sketches over a moving or still video image during a medical procedure, sold as a unit; medical telestrators in the nature of video markers with downloadable and recorded computer software featuring haptics technology for drawing freehand sketches over a moving or still video image during a medical procedure, sold as a component part of medical imaging apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | computer simulation-based instruction services in the field of medical science; computer simulation-based training services in the field of medical technology | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of automated computer hardware for use in the industrial sector; design and development of automated machinery for use in the industrial sector; hosting software platforms for virtual reality-based virtual worlds in which users can perform surgical operation simulations; hosting software platforms for virtual reality based virtual worlds in which users can utilize medical and surgical training; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting databases on a global network for use by others for collecting and sharing results of simulated medical interventions; Application service provider, namely, hosting and maintaining databases of others on a global computer network for collecting and sharing results of simulated medical interventions in the medical field; providing online non-downloadable computer software for accessing results of simulated medical interventions; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software development tools in the field of artificial intelligence; consulting, namely, computer software consulting and consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware, software design and development, and computer hardware development services in the robotics and haptics technology fields; operation of an online platform namely, providing a web hosting platform featuring haptics technology in human-computer interaction in medicine procedures and gaming; providing a diagnostic tool in the nature of an online non-downloadable software featuring haptics technology for performance improvement in the fields of medicine and gaming provided via a secure online platform, none of the foregoing for the protection of confidentiality of face-to-face conversations or in the field of speech privacy or protection | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Remote monitoring of medical data for medical diagnosis and treatment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Haply Robotics Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named HARP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 10, 2026 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |