USPTO serial 99163690
FLYGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with FLYGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Usha Menon
Usha Menon D'Ambrosio & Menon PLLCSuite 1003 Sugar Creek Center Blvd.Sugar land, TX 77478Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic security and surveillance devices, namely, electronic security tags and labels, acoustic tags, magnetic tags; Downloadable computer software platforms for viewing, analyzing, and sharing aerial data from UAVs, and autonomous vehicles; Downloadable computer software platforms for operating, controlling, maintaining, and monitoring UAVs, drones, and autonomous aircraft; Downloadable computer software platforms for receiving and transmitting real-time and post-flight data, including videos, images, sensor data, flight telemetry, flight control, and logs; Downloadable computer software platforms for managing flight data, generating alerts, and sending alerts to UAVs; Downloadable computer software platforms for requesting and accepting drone services, requesting and accepting drone services; Downloadable computer software platforms for operating UAVs; Downloadable computer software platforms for accessing and managing aerial, terrestrial, and satellite imagery, photographic, map, and geospatial data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design; Computer software development; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing transport and travel information, dispatching of motorized vehicles, aerial imaging, data collection, data analysis, and ordering package delivery supplies to customers; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for providing transport and travel information, and for ordering scheduled or non-scheduled dispatch of motorized vehicles, including land, air, and water vehicles to customers, for aerial imaging, data collection, data analysis, real-time monitoring, surveillance for aerial imaging, data collection, data analysis, real-time monitoring, surveillance of worksites, industrial facilities, and UAV flight operations, patrolling of designated airspace or operational zones, surveying of geospatial areas, construction sites, and industrial assets, inspection of UAVs, drones, autonomous vehicles, and operational sites, ordering package delivery, and enabling dispatch services. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |