USPTO serial 99167972
KRAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 774
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIGAN, MATTHEW M
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KRAK?
CopyMark Law Group can help you respond to USPTO correspondence, keep a registration alive, or watch new filings against your mark.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
San Francisco, CA, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for processing electronic payments and for transferring funds to and from others; Downloadable software for creating, preparing, managing, sending, processing, tracking, and reconciling invoices; Downloadable software for issuing receipts regarding mobile payment transactions; Downloadable software and downloadable mobile application software for processing electronic payments and for transferring funds to and from others; Downloadable authentication software for controlling access to and communications with computers and computer networks; Downloadable software for managing, reporting, and reconciling payment transactions made online and offline; Downloadable computer software for accepting in-store payments in mobile and web applications; Downloadable software for management of sales made online and offline and making payouts on such sales; Downloadable software for use in electronically trading, storing, sending, receiving, accepting and transmitting digital currency, and managing digital currency payment and exchange transactions; Downloadable software and mobile application software for facilitating financial transactions; Downloadable software and downloadable mobile application software for financial services, namely, software for accessing and reporting currency exchange data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2026 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2026 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |