USPTO serial 99187755
E2B
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANGID, HANA RONNY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E2B?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq. Gerben Perrott, PLLC1050 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 500Washington, DC 20036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing and executing AI-generated code; Downloadable computer software for creating, deploying, and managing virtual computing environments; Downloadable computer software for creating, deploying, and managing cloud sandboxes for AI agents; Downloadable computer software for use in artificial intelligence applications and machine learning, namely for analyzing and executing AI-generated code; Downloadable computer software for creating, deploying, and managing cloud sandboxes; Downloadable computer software for code generation, data analysis, and error handling; Downloadable computer software development tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services in the nature of hosting cloudbased software of others; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for code analysis, testing, and debugging; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for provisioning and controlling code execution resources; Information services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Advisory services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology (IT) cloud computing systems of others; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for running AI agents, managing sandboxes, code execution; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing sandbox environments for AI-generated code; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing cloud sandboxes for AI agents; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing cloud sandboxes for software agents; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for code analysis, code testing, code debugging, code interpretation, provisioning code execution resources, controlling code execution resources; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing runtime environments for AI agents; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for managing sandbox environments and cloud sandbox environments for AI agents; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating secure sandbox environments for AI-generated code, managing sandbox environments for AI-generated code; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating, managing, and securing sandbox environments for AI-generated code and AI agents | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |