CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ENDURA PRO

USPTO serial 99208310

ENDURA PRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENDURA PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. Jennings

Patrick J. Jennings PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN, LLP1200 Seventeenth Street, NWWashington, DC 20036United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective work gloves, namely, cut-resistant gloves, machine-knit terry cloth gloves, string knit with single and double palm gloves, lint-free gloves, ergonomic gloves, leather gloves, palm-coated gloves, winter insulated gloves, cold-resistant gloves, flame retardant gloves, high heat tolerant with hand and finger pad gloves, disposable gloves for industrial use, gloves for protection against accidents, chemical exposure protective gloves, gloves for protection against accidents, gloves for protection against vibration, gloves for use in welding for protection against accident or injury, gloves for protection against arc flash hazard; fire resistant gloves; gloves for protection against accidents; gloves for protection against accidents, irradiation and fire; gloves for use in welding for protection against accidents or injuryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2026ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 16, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 15, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2026ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 29, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 29, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance