USPTO serial 99221130
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ewa Beach, HI, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Eisenberg
Michael D. Eisenberg MDE PATENTS1991 Village Park WaySuite 202CEncinitas, CA 92024| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Roadable aircraft, namely, rotorcrafts and autogyros, all capable of locomotion by land and air; Roadable aircraft, namely, rotorcrafts and autogyros with retractable wings; autogyro-based vehicles; apparatus for locomotion by land or air, namely, autogyro-based hybrid motor vehicles; rotorcraft; helicopters; gyrocopters; autogyros; aircraft; light aircraft; drones, namely, civilian drones, camera drones, delivery drones, military drones; roadable aircraft capable of driving on the road and flying in the air | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |