USPTO serial 99256790
SANTINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PILATO, DARREN ANTHONY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SANTINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Flushing, NY, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEREK SCOTT YEE
DEREK SCOTT YEE Law Offices of Derek S. Yee6464 Sunset Blvd,Suite 1175Los Angeles, CA 90028Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Trunks being luggage; Trunks being luggage and suitcases; School bags; Cosmetic bags sold empty; Travelling bags; Clutch bags; Sports bags; Key bags; Tool bags sold empty; Chain mesh purses; Leather bags; Attache cases; Business card cases; Waist pouches; Coin purses; Wheeled bags; Duffle bags; Shoulder bags; Beach bags | ACTIVE | Mar 4, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |