USPTO serial 99302497
CHOI'S1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LADNER, CHRISOPHER G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHOI'S1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chungcheongnam-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jae Youn Kim
Jae Youn Kim NKL Law3251 Blenheim BlvdSuite 500Fairfax, VA 22030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed laver; Toasted laver; Processed green laver; Processed, edible seaweed; Dried edible seaweed (hoshi-wakame); Seaweed extracts for food; Seasoned laver (Jaban-gim); Sheets of dried laver (hoshi-nori); Toasted sheets of laver (yaki-nori); Laver, preserved; Seaweed-based snacks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |