USPTO serial 99333963
INSTINCT AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 802
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, SHATONI A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INSTINCT AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seattle, WA, US
Seattle, WA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach
Connie L. Ellerbach Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041-1990Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Testing of computer software; Website load testing services; Website usability testing services; Consulting services for others in the field of design, planning, and implementation project management of software testing; Computer programming services; computer software and computer programming consulting and technical advice; quality assurance testing of computer programs; Programming of computer software for others; quality management services, namely, quality evaluation and analysis, quality assurance, and quality control, in the field of software development; IT consulting services relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; IT services, namely software development, programming and implementation testing; IT consultancy, advisory and information services relating to software development, programming and implementation testing, and maintenance, and repair of computer software; computer system analysis and diagnostics; Computer project management services; technological services relating to computers, namely, testing of computer software and networks of others; Monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; scientific and technological services, namely, testing, advice, consultancy, and quality control services for others in the field of computer software development; industrial research in the field of computer programming and computer software; Design and development of computer software; providing online non downloadable software for managing, processing, operating and accessing an AI agent; providing online non-downloadable software for building and running multi-agent software systems and for decision-making in autonomous systems; providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence technology for use in test planning, code writing, failure investigations, test maintenance and reporting software bugs and viruses; providing information concerning software and application testing results, metrics, and analytics; providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for optimizing end-to-end regression testing of browser-based and native mobile applications; design and development of software for multi-agent systems; none of the aforementioned for use in connection with veterinary software and applications and veterinary practice management tools and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2026 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 28, 2026 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 24, 2026 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |