USPTO serial 99350601
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. Monitor the opposition window. After it closes, watch for Notice of Allowance (intent-to-use) or registration (use-based).
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Costa Mesa, CA, US
Costa Mesa, CA, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine E. Maxson
Catherine E. Maxson Davis Wright Tremaine LLP920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300Seattle, WA 98104-1610United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | design and development of distributed edge computing systems, platforms, gateways, and devices; distributed edge computing services featuring online, non-downloadable software for processing, analyzing, managing, and storing data across distributed edge computing sites; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring distributed edge computing computer software for deploying, managing, monitoring, and scaling applications, artificial intelligence workloads, compute resources, containers, clusters, and infrastructure across distributed edge computing sites; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for centrally managing distributed computing sites, namely, receiving, processing, and analyzing data, results, and insights from distributed computing sites, and directing, monitoring, and managing distributed computing resources; providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for processing, analyzing, managing, and storing data across distributed edge computing sites; providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence, namely, large language models for processing, analyzing, managing, and storing data across distributed edge computing sites, and for receiving, processing, and analyzing data, results, and insights from distributed computing sites, and directing, monitoring, and managing distributed computing resources; providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence, namely, software for creating, deploying, managing, and executing artificial intelligence agents; GPU as a Service (GaaS) services featuring software for providing on-demand access to graphics processing units; electronic data storage; design and management of information technology systems to maintain data security; data security consulting services; data management consulting services, namely, consulting regarding the collection, electronic storage, and security of data across distributed edge computing systems; data management services, namely, electronic storing and securing data across distributed edge computing systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | consulting services regarding compliance with data protection laws and regulations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |