USPTO serial 99387102
BRAZEAI DECISIONING STUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 819
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANGOTTI, SALVATORE JOHN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAZEAI DECISIONING STUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY, US
New York, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna Kuhn
Anna Kuhn Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300Austin, TX 78702United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for business analytics; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for data analytics; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for use in creating marketing content; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for automating marketing messages; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for performing market segmentation analysis; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for suggesting the optimal copy, time, and method to send advertising and marketing content; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for selecting the best channels to communicate with customers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for transmitting, and analyzing marketing messages in the nature of A/B testing marketing messages; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for identifying and messaging users based on their likelihood to perform an event; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for predicting user interests; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for predicting items a customer is most likely to purchase next; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for marketing in the nature of designing custom algorithms for use in digital advertising; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for automating marketing messages; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for performing market segmentation analysis; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for suggesting the optimal copy, time, and method to send advertising and marketing content; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for selecting the best channels to communicate with customers; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for transmitting, and analyzing marketing messages in the nature of A/B testing marketing messages; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for identifying and messaging users based on their likelihood to perform an event; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for predicting user interests; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for predicting items a customer is most likely to purchase next | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 16, 2026 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |