CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ROLLIE

USPTO serial 99397058

ROLLIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 616
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PATEL, SHEENA KAPOOR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROLLIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roy D. Gross

Roy D. Gross The Roy Gross Law Firm, LLC19 Old Kings Hwy SSuite 200Darien, CT 06820

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Gardening carts; Goods handling carts; Mobile storage cart for domestic and commercial use; Garden carts; Wheeled, collapsible carts; Wheeled, collapsible carts for gardening; none of the aforementioned goods being trolleys or wheeled caddies in the nature of dollies for container transportACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 23, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 27, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 27, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 10, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Sep 17, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance