Drawing for CHALK INK

USPTO serial 99430384

CHALK INK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 647Office Action
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEICHTER, KENNETH HOWARD
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 134

What this means

The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.

Need help with CHALK INK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adrian Resendez

Adrian Resendez Brough & Resendez PLLC1213 W Slaughter Lane, Suite 100Austin, TX 78748United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Writing instruments; Felt-tip pens; instruments for writing, painting, marking and drawings made from felt-tip and paint pens and markers; Dry erase markers; Dry erase writing boards; Blackboards; Writing slatesACTIVEFeb 6, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 30, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 30, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 30, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 22, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 22, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 22, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jun 22, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 22, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jun 18, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 7, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 7, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance