USPTO serial 99430384
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrian Resendez
Adrian Resendez Brough & Resendez PLLC1213 W Slaughter Lane, Suite 100Austin, TX 78748United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Writing instruments; Felt-tip pens; instruments for writing, painting, marking and drawings made from felt-tip and paint pens and markers; Dry erase markers; Dry erase writing boards; Blackboards; Writing slates | ACTIVE | Feb 6, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |