USPTO serial 99435758
FERGUSON LAW GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAIHOS, JESSIE ANDREA
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Deadline: November 7, 2026
Need help with FERGUSON LAW GROUP?
CopyMark Law Group can help you respond to USPTO correspondence, keep a registration alive, or watch new filings against your mark.
Office Action issues
The USPTO examiner has refused registration because your trademark is considered primarily a surname, requiring us to show acquired distinctiveness or explore alternative registration options (Section 2(e)(4): Primarily a Surname).
Owner
Perice Dea Sibley
Livermore, CA, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Legal services; Legal services relating to legal conveyancing; Legal consultation services; Legal support services; Legal information services; On-site legal services; Legal advisory services; Legal consultancy services; Legal investigation services; Legal research services; Legal services, namely, providing customized information, counseling, advice and litigation services in all areas of employment and labor law for both employees and employers; Legal consulting services in the field of listing and tracking of foreign and domestic government regulatory requirements, for obtaining permits and regulatory compliance; Legal research relating to business mergers; Providing information in the field of business law; Security services for individuals and business persons traveling internationally and domestically; Providing information in the field of business law, litigation and intellectual property; Personal concierge services comprising running errands for others to meet the needs of individuals rendered in business establishments; Legal consulting services in the field of business succession planning and related litigation; Legal consulting services in the field of trusts and estates. | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2026 |
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2026 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |