Drawing for RF COMMAND CENTER

USPTO serial 99451976

RF COMMAND CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DAVIS, MARC STEPHEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RF COMMAND CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Malcolm McGowan

Malcolm McGowan CERMAK & MCGOWAN LLP2000 Duke St.Suite 300Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectrum analyzers for drone detection and monitoringACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 16, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 16, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 19, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 19, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 19, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 11, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 20, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Oct 20, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance