USPTO serial 99476291
NAPLES WINE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Deadline: December 2, 2026
Need help with NAPLES WINE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Office Action issues
The examiner has identified that your trademark is considered geographically descriptive and requires a disclaimer for certain wording, though no conflicting marks were found in the USPTO database.
Owner
Fort Myers, FL, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Beach bags; Wine bags with handles for carrying or holding wine; Beach umbrellas; Umbrellas; Wine carrying cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Wine glasses; Bottle openers, electric and non-electric; Travel mugs; Charcuterie boards for serving and cutting charcuterie; Coolers for wine; Wine drip collars specially adapted for use around the top of wine bottles to stop drips; Wine bottle vests specially adapted for decorating wine bottles; Vacuum bottle stoppers specially adapted for use with wine bottles; Bottle stoppers specially adapted for use with wine bottles; Wine cooling pails; Wine coasters of precious metal; Wine buckets; Vacuum pumps for wine bottles; Wine aerators; Wine-tasting pipettes; Wine decanters; Non-electric coolers for wine | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Sweatshirts; Baseball caps and hats; Tee shirts; Rain coats; Wind coats; Polo shirts; Bathing suits; Beach coverups | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Wine; Wine spritzers; Wine-based cocktails; Prepared wine cocktails; Sparkling wine cocktails; Wine-based beverage, namely, piquette; Sparkling fruit wine; Natural sparkling wines; Table wines; Cooking wine; Aperitifs with a wine base; Wine punch; Wine-based drinks; Mulled wine; Aperitif wines; Alcoholic beverages containing wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Venessa Hetherington
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named NAPLES WINE COMPANY
- Prosecution event GNRN explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |