USPTO serial 99480845
DEAN & DELUCA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RENNEKER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEAN & DELUCA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry I. Friedman
Barry I. Friedman Metz Lewis Brodman Must O'Keefe LLC444 Liberty Avenue, Suite 2100Pittsburgh, PA 15222United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Condiments; Coffee; Coffee beans; Chocolate candies; fresh and prepackaged baked goods namely bagels, buns, breads, cupcakes, cakes, pies, pizza dough, quiche and egg-based dishes; Rice; Sauces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |