Drawing for TROVE-AI

USPTO serial 99545387

TROVE-AI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TROVE-AI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly B. Markley

Molly B. Markley Young, Basile, Hanlon & MacFarlane P.C.3001 West Big Beaver RoadSuite 624Troy, MI 48084

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Design, development and implementation of software; Design and development of artificial intelligence (AI) software; Design and development of software for machine learning; Developing customized software for others; Customizing computer software; Developing customized software for others in the fields of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and automated intelligent natural language response generationACTIVESep 30, 2024

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 23, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 23, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 19, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 19, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 19, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 6, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 12, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Dec 12, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance