USPTO serial 99545387
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Dallas, GA, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly B. Markley
Molly B. Markley Young, Basile, Hanlon & MacFarlane P.C.3001 West Big Beaver RoadSuite 624Troy, MI 48084| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design, development and implementation of software; Design and development of artificial intelligence (AI) software; Design and development of software for machine learning; Developing customized software for others; Customizing computer software; Developing customized software for others in the fields of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and automated intelligent natural language response generation | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2024 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |