Drawing for DEAN & DELUCA

USPTO serial 99581521

DEAN & DELUCA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RENNEKER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEAN & DELUCA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry I. Friedman

Barry I. Friedman Metz Lewis Brodman Must O'Keefe LLC444 Liberty AvenueSuite 2100Pittsburgh, PA 15222

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant and café servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 11, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 11, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 11, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 19, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 7, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 7, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance