USPTO serial 99617700
PICKVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHELAN, JAIME M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICKVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Portsmouth, NH, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy P. Collins
Timothy P. Collins Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts LLP33 Boston Post Road West, Suite 410Marlborough, MA 01752United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for computer-vision-based item picking, inventory identification, order fulfillment, and package room management; downloadable computer software featuring artificial intelligence-powered visual guidance and precision tracking of inventory, packages, and picked items; downloadable computer software featuring artificial intelligence powered visual guidance and precision tracking of inventory, packages, deliveries, and picked items; downloadable mobile applications for guiding users to pick items using light, laser, audio, or visual cues; electronic sensors, namely, camera sensors, depth sensors, and LiDAR sensors for machine vision, object detection, and location tracking; wireless RFID readers and RFID tags for tracking packages, inventory, and deliveries; pick-to-light and pick-to-laser electronic guidance devices, namely, illuminated indicators, electronic displays, and laser-pointing devices for directing picking operations; barcode scanners and two-dimensional code scanners; downloadable middleware and firmware for integrating cameras, sensors, RFID/BLE hardware, and picking guidance devices with warehouse management systems (WMS), transportation management systems (TMS), and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring artificial intelligence for computer-vision-based item picking, item verification, spatial localization, and workflow optimization; platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring application programming interfaces for computer vision, object recognition, sensor fusion, RFID/BLE data processing, and pick guidance; artificial intelligence as a service (AIaaS) services for visual guidance, route optimization inside facilities, and error detection in picking workflows; design and development of computer hardware and software for logistics, picking, sorting, and package room operations; cloud computing services for monitoring picking activity, operational analytics, and device status; computer system integration and technological consulting in the fields of computer vision, logistics technology, and item tracking. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |