USPTO serial 99623401
POPPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TORRES, MIGUEL A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POPPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charlene A. Azema
Charlene A. Azema Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th floorIrvine, CA 92614United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Invoicing services; Business invoicing services; Reconciling invoices; Tracking and monitoring business-related expenses in the nature of business spend on outsourced services for others for account auditing purposes; Tracking and monitoring business-related expenses in the nature of business spend on outsourced services for others for cost accounting purposes; Analyzing and compiling business data for tracking and managing business spend in different units; Preparing business reports; Preparing financial reports for others; Data processing for the compilation of data for business purposes; Systematization of data in computer databases | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for financial management and financial operations; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for budget management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for tracking and reporting business expenses; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications using artificial intelligence (AI) for analyzing business invoices; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications using artificial intelligence (AI) for budget management; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications using artificial intelligence (AI) for tracking and reporting on business expenses; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications using artificial intelligence (AI) for financial analysis; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for financial analysis; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications using artificial intelligence (AI) for business spend management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for business spend management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for tracking invoices, for routing invoices to the correct business unit, for categorizing invoices, and for creating reports on the foregoing; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating statistics and reports on business spend that allows businesses to monitor and track their spend | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |