USPTO serial 99636919
DIAMOND GLOVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIAMOND GLOVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Ana, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clement Cheng
Clement Cheng4522 Katella Avenue Ste. 200Los Alamitos, CA 90720United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Gloves for medical use; Gloves for use in hospitals; Latex medical gloves; Nitrile gloves for medical use | ACTIVE | Sep 6, 2011 |
| 021 | Disposable latex and nitrile gloves for general use; Disposable latex gloves for general use; Disposable plastic gloves for general use; Disposable plastic gloves for use in the food service industry | ACTIVE | Sep 6, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |