USPTO serial 99651689
VENGEANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWEENEY, MOLLY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with VENGEANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Aurora, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander C. Kaczmarek
Alexander C. Kaczmarek Harter Secrest & Emery LLP50 Fountain PlazaSuite 1000Buffalo, NY 14202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Counter-unmanned aerial intelligence and defeat system (C-UAS), namely, computer hardware and recorded computer software for local and remote operation of payloads; Counter-unmanned aerial intelligence and defeat system (C-UAS), namely, modular mounts for electro-optical, infrared, radar, and target-tracking sensors; Payload management systems, namely, payload control systems comprised electronic displays, sensors, interfaces, computer hardware, and recorded software for payload systems control and computer hardware with embedded operating system software for payload systems control | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Counter-unmanned aerial intelligence and defeat system (C-UAS), namely, modular weapon mounts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |