USPTO serial 99690807
CIGNAL AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLACK, MILDRED ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CIGNAL AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
REEDSVILLE, PA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven E. Tiller
Steven E. Tiller Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLPSeven Saint Paul StreetBaltimore, MD 21202-1636United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consultancy in the fields of machine learning and AI; Business data analysis featuring sensor fusion and AI-generated outputs | ACTIVE | Jul 14, 2025 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in developing generative artificial intelligence; Providing online non-downloadable software for generating text, images, and sensor data from natural language prompts in the field of data science, defense, robotics, industrial inspection, cybersecurity, and government and commercial security applications | ACTIVE | Jul 14, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |