Drawing for THE ONENESS METHOD

USPTO serial 99710512

THE ONENESS METHOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DANG, PETER T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ONENESS METHOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta L. Christensen

Roberta L. Christensen Koley Jessen P.C., L.L.O.One Pacific Place, Suite 8001125 S 103rd StreetOmaha, NE 68124

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Religious instruction services; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational speaking services in the field of self- and personal improvement; Providing training in the field of self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; Arranging and conducting of educational conferences in the field of self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; Education services, namely, providing exhibitions, seminars, and conferences in the field of self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality; Production of television programs; Film production; Recording studio services; Presentation of live show performances; Dubbing services; Entertainment services, namely, an ongoing series featuring self- and personal improvement and empowerment, religion, and spirituality provided through televisionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 24, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2026MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 18, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2026NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance