USPTO serial 99725008
AURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBINSON, GAYONNE N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 138
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rhett V. Barney
Rhett V. Barney Lee & Hayes PC601 W Riverside Ave. Suite 1400Spokane, WA 99201United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services in the field of sales enablement, business productivity, organizational efficiency, and internal performance optimization; Business advisory services in the field of sales training, internal business analytics, and workflow improvement; Providing business intelligence services | ACTIVE | Oct 22, 2024 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for internal business operations, namely, content management, knowledge management, sales enablement, business training, customer relationship management, and performance analytics; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications using artificial intelligence (AI) for organizing, searching, summarizing, generating, and recommending internal business content and data; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for business workflow automation, sales coaching, sales performance analysis, and generation of sales and training materials | ACTIVE | Oct 22, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2026 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |